Original ArticleHyperglycemia management in patients admitted to internal medicine in Spain: A point-prevalence survey examining adequacy of glycemic control and guideline adherence
Introduction
Diabetes is one of the fastest growing pandemics in human history. It has been estimated that 14% of the Spanish adult population has diabetes, and this prevalence may double in the coming decades [1]. In parallel, the percentage of patients with diabetes requiring hospitalization has doubled in recent years. Approximately one in four patients admitted to the hospital has a known diagnosis of diabetes [2], [3] and about 30% of patients with diabetes require two or more hospitalizations in any given year [3]. The prevalence of diabetes is higher in elderly patients and residents of long-term-care facilities, in whom diabetes is reported in up to one third of adults aged 65–75 yr and in 40% of those older than 80 yr [4], [5].
Patients with diabetes are more likely to require hospitalization than subjects without diabetes, mostly due to cardiovascular diseases, but also by other processes (cancer, infections, pancreatitis or hip fractures, etc.) [6]. In addition, patients with diabetes have a worse overall prognosis and a higher risk of complications, extended hospitalization and mortality [7], [8].
Different studies have shown that both hyper- and hypoglycemia are associated with more complications and increased mortality in hospitalized patients [9]. In order to guide ongoing glycemic management it is recommended to perform bedside capillary testing before meals and at bedtime in patients who are eating, or every 4–6 h in patients who are receiving nothing by mouth. Treatment should be addressed to a premeal glucose target of less than 140 mg/dL (7.8 mmol/L) and a random blood glucose of less than 180 mg/dL (10.0 mmol/L) for the majority of hospitalized patients in non-critical areas. Due to the risk of severe hyper or hypoglycaemia, the use of sliding scale as the sole method for glycemic control in patients with diabetes has been considered as non-appropriate. The use of subcutaneous insulin therapy consisting on basal or intermediate-acting insulin given once or twice a day in combination with rapid- or short-acting insulin administered before meals in patients who are eating has been considered as the standard of care due to its safety. In addition, a standardized hospital-wide, nurse-initiated hypoglycemia treatment protocol should be implemented to prompt immediate therapy of any recognized hypoglycemia, defined as a blood glucose below 70 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L). All these standards have been included in a recently published evidence-based guideline and rated as strong recommendations [10].
Few studies have analyzed how are patients with diabetes managed in the hospital and the degree of diabetes control. We carried out the present study to evaluate care based on individualized performance measures and appropriateness of hyperglycemia management in hospitalized patients in the non-critical care setting.
Section snippets
Survey design
A mail was sent to the members of the Diabetes and Obesity Study Group from the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine inviting to participate in the study. The survey was considered to be a public health surveillance activity and therefore it was approved with a waiver of the requirement for informed consent. Information obtained was recorded such that subjects could not be recognized, directly or through identifiers linked to the subjects. Patients were included in surveys performed between
Hospitals and patients
A total of 111 (14%) out of 789 hospitals located in Spain participated in the study. Of the 111 hospitals, 34 (30.6%) were small (< 200 beds), 36 (32.4%) were medium-sized (201–500 beds), and 41 (36.9%) were large (> 500 beds). Fifty hospitals were university affiliated, 28 hospitals were non-university affiliated, 8 hospitals were private institutions and 25 did not provide information.
A total of 5439 hospitalized patients were surveyed and 1000 (18.4%) had hyperglycemia or known diabetes. The
Discussion
The present study was carried out to assess the grade of glycemic control and the rate of adherence to guidelines in the management of patients with hyperglycemia admitted to internal medicine departments. Among the published guidelines [10], [13], [14] we chose the American Endocrinologist guideline as the reference due to its comprehensiveness [10]. The study provided a nationally representative number of patients admitted to Spanish community hospitals, university associated institutions and
Learning points
- •
Approximately one out of five patients admitted to internal medicine wards suffers from hyperglycemia or diabetes.
- •
HbA1c value, an important information to diagnose stress hyperglycemia and to guide treatment for hyperglycemia when the patient is going to be discharged, is absent in many cases.
- •
Sliding scale insulin treatment, a regimen to control glucose in hospitalized patients not endorsed by guidelines, is still used in 20% of hospitalized patients.
- •
We observed a progressively worse control of
Diabetes and obesity working group
Meritxell Royuela Juncadella (ALTHAIA. Xarxa Assistencial Universitària de Manresa), Miguel Ángel García Ordóñez (Hospital de Antequera), Lourdes Mateos Polo (Complejo Asistencial de Salamanca), Sara Pérez (Complejo Asistencial Universitario de León), José Ignacio Cuende Melero (Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Palencia), Maria Ruiz Gonzalez (Complejo Hospitalario de Jaén), Trinitario Sánchez Montón (Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Cartagena), Vladimir Lazo Yakimtseva (Fundació Sant
Funding support
Novo Nordisk Laboratories. The funds facilitated the development of an electronic case record file. Novo Nordisk had no role in study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the article for publication.
Statement of human and animal rights
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by the any of the authors.
Statement of informed consent
The Spanish Society of Internal Medicine determined the survey to be a health services surveillance and quality improvement activity and it was approved with a waiver of the requirement for informed consent.
Conflict of interest
The authors state that they have no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgments
We thank Prof. Guillermo Umpierrez for the critical review of the manuscript.
References (25)
- et al.
Diabetes mellitus among ethnic seniors: contrasts with diabetes in whites
Clin Geriatr Med
(1999) An overview of diabetes mellitus in older persons
Clin Geriatr Med
(1999)- et al.
A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation
J Chronic Dis
(1987) - et al.
Frequency of hypoglycemia and its impact on length of stay, mortality, and short-term readmission in patients with diabetes hospitalized in internal medicine wards
Endocr Pract
(2014) - et al.
Long-term improvements in insulin prescribing habits and glycaemic control in medical inpatients associated with the introduction of a standardized educational approach
Diabetes Res Clin Pract
(2009) - et al.
Prevalence of diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose regulation in Spain: the [email protected] Study
Diabetologia
(2012) - et al.
Hyperglycemia: an independent marker of in-hospital mortality in patients with undiagnosed diabetes
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
(2002) - et al.
Multiple hospitalizations for patients with diabetes
Diabetes Care
(2003) - et al.
Home-based primary care and the risk of ambulatory care-sensitive condition hospitalization among older veterans with diabetes mellitus (2014)
JAMA Intern Med
(Sep. 15 2014) - et al.
Increased hospital morbidity among trauma patients with diabetes mellitus compared with age- and injury severity score-matched control subjects
Arch Surg
(2007)
Diabetes mellitus and mortality after acute coronary syndrome as a first or recurrent cardiovascular event
PLoS One
Effect of glycemic state on hospital mortality in critically ill surgical patients
Am Surg
Cited by (24)
Inpatient management of diabetes and hyperglycemia: an audit of Spanish hospitals
2023, Revista Clinica EspanolaClinical practice guidelines adaptation for internists - An EFIM methodology
2020, European Journal of Internal MedicineCitation Excerpt :The main aim of the process is to get a reliable product dedicated to internal medicine doctors which will be easy to implement in everyday clinical practice and will fit the best the needs of their patients. It is believed that the CPG developed and disseminated by EFIM will be broadly used by European internists and this will close the existing gap between the guidelines and the management of the patients [13]. The EFIM CPG-WG during the first meeting chose 3 members (IM, WL, LM) who would be responsible to elaborate the methodology which would be used to prepare EFIM guidelines summary for internists.
Impact of structured insulin order sets on inpatient hypoglycemia and glycemic control
2020, Endocrine PracticeCitation Excerpt :Particularly, “basal bolus” regimens are recommended by clinical practice guidelines (18–20). Regimens incorporating basal insulin have been shown to be safe and effective (21,22). Despite this wealth of evidence, use of correction dose alone or “sliding scale” insulin (SSI) regimens remains prevalent (23,24).
Implementation of an electronic dashboard with a remote management system to improve glycemic management among hospitalized adults
2020, Endocrine PracticeCitation Excerpt :Hyperglycemia is common in inpatient populations, with an estimated prevalence of 22 to 46% among noncritically ill hospitalized patients (2,3). Inpatients with hyperglycemia are at increased risk of disease complications, comorbidities, mortality, longer hospital stays, higher healthcare resource utilization, additional readmissions, and they experience an increased rate of progression to intensive care (5–7). Several early randomized controlled trials demonstrated that tight glycemic control was beneficial for reducing morbidity and mortality among patients in surgical intensive care, while subsequent trials in mixed medical/surgical intensive care units failed to show these benefits (8).
- 1
Both authors contributed equally to the manuscript.